News

How South Africa’s voters are making service delivery a priority over manifestos

Karabo Ngoepe|Published

Political parties will need to change their strategies heading into the local government elections as voters prioritise service delivery over manifestos.

Image: IOL

South Africa’s political parties are learning a hard truth ahead of this year’s local government elections: catchy slogans and fiery rallies no longer win over voters on their own. Strategy, data and delivery have taken over as the real campaign battlegrounds.

As communities grow impatient with broken promises and collapsing municipal services, voters are putting political leaders under unprecedented scrutiny. Water outages, power cuts and deteriorating infrastructure have become the true test of credibility. In many areas, residents say their votes will depend not on party loyalty, but on who can get the basics right.

In Midrand, resident Malebo Kgwete reflected the growing frustration after Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi remarked that he showers at a hotel when there is no water. “Some of us can’t afford that. We expect solutions, not reminders of how differently our leaders live,” she said.

Political analysts say the incident reveals a broader shift in South African politics. Service delivery failures are no longer distant policy concerns, they now define campaign outcomes.

Professor Ntwanano Mathebula described Lesufi’s remark as “negligent and reckless”, especially in a province where many communities still struggle for clean, reliable water. “At a time when people are battling to access water, such comments highlight the gap between leadership and ordinary life,” he said.

In Hammanskraal, residents continue to rely on bottled water after years of political turnover. “The municipality was under the ANC, the DA and now ActionSA, but nothing has improved,” said resident Mosima Dolo. “Our taps run dry, and even when water comes out, it’s unsafe to drink. It feels like leaders just take turns failing us.”

Against this backdrop, campaign strategy has become essential. Analysts say parties are moving from personality-driven politics to professional, data-informed planning. Field surveys, targeted messaging and rapid-response teams are replacing rallies and broad slogans.

“Campaigns often fail, not because policies are weak, but because leaders appear disconnected from real problems,” said communications strategist Cynthia Manjoro. “Parties need grounded, evidence-based messaging that speaks to local realities.”

These efforts mark a quiet transformation in South African politics. Parties are investing in structured operations, data analysis and community engagement models designed to rebuild trust one ward at a time.

Candidate selection has also become central to campaign strategy. According to Mathebula, the individual political parties put forward reflect how seriously they take governance.

“Who you nominate for councillor or mayor shows whether a party values competence and integrity. “Communities want leaders they can believe in,” he said. ”

Mathebula added that municipalities remain the critical link between citizens and the state. “This is where people experience government daily, through electricity, roads, rubbish collection and clean water. When that breaks down, so does confidence in leadership.”

Low voter turnout in recent years reflects that fatigue. In some communities, frustration has escalated into calls for election boycotts, sending a warning signal to political parties across the spectrum.

The rapid rise of coalition councils has added new complications. With alliances shifting frequently, voters often struggle to assign blame when services collapse.

Professor Ricky Mukonza said this has muddied accountability. “Blame-shifting is now common in coalition-run municipalities. It’s difficult for residents to know who’s responsible when nothing gets fixed,” he said. “Parties must now show not only what they plan to do, but how they would govern together in divided councils.”

This has pushed campaigns to focus more on coalition management and shared accountability, turning local elections into a test of political cooperation as much as public approval.

Social media has become a defining tool in local campaigning. Mukonza said platforms such as X (formerly Twitter), Facebook and TikTok now shape public opinion faster than traditional campaigning ever could. “Online spaces can build support in hours or destroy reputations in minutes,” he said.

Digital strategy now sits at the heart of every major campaign. From ward-level WhatsApp groups to targeted digital ads, parties are seeking to meet voters where they already are, online. But as Mukonza noted, this also requires constant monitoring and agility to respond before narratives spiral out of control.

Engaging young voters remains one of the biggest challenges. Despite being highly active online, analysts say political parties have not done enough to attract or educate first-time voters.

“There’s very little structured outreach to young people, which is a major oversight,” said Mathebula.

Mukonza added that the youth demographic could become decisive. “Parties are being forced to use social media creatively to connect with younger voters. This group expects authenticity, not empty slogans.”

With party loyalty weakening and undecided voters on the rise, South Africa’s local elections are shaping up to be a contest of competence more than charisma. In some municipalities, even small shifts in sentiment could tilt control from one party to another.

Mukonza said voter behaviour remains unpredictable. “Sometimes voters punish poor performance, but in other cases, loyalties persist despite it. The parties that blend vision, credibility and genuine delivery will gain the upper hand,” he said.

karabo.ngoepe@inl.co.za